[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]
Re: Accepting your "exceptions" - conclusion?
>>>find it frustrating trying to get you to understand a concept that seems to have eluded Randall and you to date. Again you are defending the "exception."<<<<<
Hmmmm. Two questions come to mind: (1) What fuc*ing exception are you constantly referring to---that I am supposedly defending? (2) Can I withdraw my defense of the unknown exception and enter a plea of you are right, I am wrong? If so, I would like to do that now.
>>>> Have you seen the engine bay pix of the Trans Am cars?<<<<<
Answer: Yes, but no one saw me see it, so, the corrected answer would be no.
>>>>You are looking for "exceptions" without thinking it thru<<<<<
I'm not right now, but I was last night around closing time.
>>>>MATH any of your "exceptions" to prove me wrong, don't just toss them onto the fire<<<<<
Since I haven't a clue what you are referring to when you refer to exceptions, I can't do the math. Probably couldn't even if I knew what you are referring to, sorry.
>>>> Did you or Randall actually see Eric's boost guage GO to 85Hg, the maximum of it's read?<<<<<
Answer: I don't know what Randall saw, or whether he can see at all. More importantly, Randall is a dentist and dentists frighten me. As for me, no I did not see the boost guage GO to 85Hg. In fact, I did not see the boost guage go anywhere. If you have ever ridden with Eric on the streets of St. Louis, I think you know why.
>>>> That is what he is claiming, you and Randall
Answer is: Whatever you say.
>>>> Who saw it other than the claimant<<<<
Relax man. Who cares?
>>>>> A lot of us here are saying NO ONE, based on the claim vs math<<<<<
Ah, correction: You are saying it a lot of times, which makes it sound like a lot of people are are saying it--whatever it may be. All I asked was several dumb questions about the egt's.
>>>>Scott Justusson, RS2 wannabe<<<<
Bruce Aukerman, wannabe a cowboy