[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]
Torsen Torture, pt. II...
In message <199803111413.JAA31687@camel8.mindspring.com> email@example.com (Jeffrey J. Goggin) writes:
> For all its clever engineering, the Torsen is a dumb device and I think once
> everyone focuses on how it works, not how it works in a particular model of
> car, we will quickly reach a consensus. Then, and only then, can we begin
> to explore how its character might manifest itself in one particular chassis
> or another ... otherwise, I fear that we'll forever be caught in the riptide
> of "my car does this/my car doesn't do this" and go round and round in circles.
I hold the opposite view. Until I can recreate the problem to my own
satisfaction, it doesn't exist.
I have too much experience (a lot of it recent, since I'm becoming known as the
UK's MB engine expert) of people coming to me and describing symptoms that I
can't understand, can't reproduce on my own car, and finally can't even
reproduce on _theirs_.
As I've posted several times - I've thrown the ur-quattro about so much over
the last four years and 80000 miles that I'm _certain_ I would have seen this
hypothesised effect. I haven't. Hopefully, I'll have my car back tomorrow or
Friday, and then I can try some experiments.
If, indeed, there is this exposure with a central torsen differential - where
is the public documentation? Where are the recalls to change percentage
limits? Where are the cautions in the owners' handbooks? A quick search on
Alta Vista reveals that _lots_ of cars use torsens in different ways - but
there's nothing, absolutely nothing, to support some of the wilder theories
of operation posted here.
Dave couldn't find a problem with his RS2 - Roger Galvin didn't find a problem
with his 200TQ. By the weekend, I should know more about the ur-quattro.
UK Audi [ur-]quattro Owners Club