[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]
Re: License Plate
>On Thu, 16 Feb 1995, Andrew Shea wrote:
>> I'm not trying to argue, but I have had a front plate on my
>> Massachusetts registered car for a year now. They have been switching
>> over to the two plate system for over two years. Everytime a person
>> needs a new plate, the registery now gives them two plates. The reason
>> for the switch over (according to a state Trooper) is that it makes it
>> easier for a hit and run victim to identify the car that hit them by
>> allowing them to view the plate before they are hit. Just my $.02.
>I feel the need to leave my $.02 as well,
>I live in Ohio, which requires two plates for legal operation. I have
>always felt that the front plates detracted from the looks of a car.
>This is especially true of something with a pointed, sculpted nose
>section. All cars sold (in theory) in states that require two plates are
>equipped with a front plate holder. If the car was originally purchased
>in a state without front plate regulations, it probably doesn't have
>one. That's why someone with the exact year/model might have a front
>holder when your doesn't.
Hey, I had to put a frame (Audi part) and plate on the front of a
beautiful, untouched '83 TQC here in Colorado. Looks terrible but you sort
of get used to it. But no more complaining, okay...brings back bad