[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]
In a message dated 97-01-03 21:01:06 EST, you write:
<< While Scott is right about the quad setup [cheap, tweakable,
etc.,] I put one side in my 200 wagon from a wrecked 5 car and, while I
don't much care what some things look like, it was ugly. Too ugly, IMHO.
quads on the sleek 5k-200t/q's certainly look "dated" (substitute word of
choice here) on the aero chassis for sure.... So is it cool and sleek but
compromised performance, or correct and better, but compromising vanity?
Tough choice... Thank goodness the urq doesn't blare the ugly with it's
quad fours.... I would think some bright chroming of the light assbly and a
lexan cover bent properly would clean up the front end some.... The quad 5
3/4 round setup would prolly look the best and still be correct, and not too
hard a crack into the mirror when gandered..... 550USD is a lot of money to
be blown away in performance by the 84 5k next to you lookin ugly & bright
I sure expected the thoughts tho Bruce, the wallet is hard to pull out with
the vanity thing, reason even the Igor recommended Matrix connection didn't
motivate too many on this list....