[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]
Re: 3.0 Bar Turbo Boost!?!?
- To: "email@example.com" <firstname.lastname@example.org>
- Subject: Re: 3.0 Bar Turbo Boost!?!?
- From: Dave Eaton <email@example.com>
- Date: Thu, 12 Dec 1996 09:30:05 +0012
- Autoforwarded: false
- Disclose-Recipients: prohibited
- Hop-Count: 1
- Importance: normal
- In-Reply-To: <199612110508.AAA13333@coimbra.ans.net>
- Mr-Received: by mta MOEMR0.MUAS; Relayed; Thu, 12 Dec 1996 09:30:05 +0012
- Mr-Received: by mta CSAV10; Relayed; Thu, 12 Dec 1996 09:30:24 +0012
- Priority: normal
- Sender: firstname.lastname@example.org
- Ua-Content-Id: 11AC625E0100
- X400-Mts-Identifier: [;5205300912121996/A67245/CSAV10]
yes, the new zealand experience of rs2's is that they really need 98 octane
unleaded to give their best. our super unleaded is only 96 which is fine for
my 3b ur-q, not so good for my s2, and not good at all for the rs2 according
to the audi service folks. one of the rs2 owners in wellington runs one tank
of av-gas (100 octane) for every 3 tanks of 96 unleaded.
91 unleaded would result in serious performance loss (at best) imho.
mind you my business partner got an rs2 for a day while his porker was getting
fixed. he tried to find a performance loss, but didn't have much success ;-)
..>Date: Tue, 10 Dec 1996 23:57:17 -0500
..>Ned's (Intended Acceleration) new price list for his Audi turbo mods. lists a
..>3.0 Bar (24-25psig) computer modification for both the 91 200(20v)TQ's and
..>the S4/S6- I think he is calling this stage V. He apparently modifies the
..>chips as well as changes out the pressure transducer. This computer mod.
..>must be done in conjunction with the higher flow exhaust manifold and sport
..>turbo (RS2 turbo I believe) so it aint cheap but he's claiming 330 horses for
..>the 200TQ and 340 horses for the S4/S6. Just want to know what you all think
..>about running that much boost on such a high compression engine (9.3 to 1)
..>using the pump gas - the best stuff I can buy in Colorado is 91 octane. I
..>have had some discussions with Scott (PDQSHIP) but wanted to solicit some
..>more discussion before I spend the big bucks on a bigger turbo and Ned's
..>computer mods (I already have the RS2 manifold, 2.3 Bar ECU, and K&N cone
..>filter on my 94 S4). I have the following questions:
..>1. Anyone tried this Stage 5 mod., if so how's it working?
..>2. Will this wear out your engine significantly sooner than if I keep
..>running my current mods (I use Mobil 1 15W50 and change it every 3-5K and
..>currently have 54,000 miles on the odometer- car was completely unmodified
..>3. Will this cause any particular hoses to blow more often ( I have already
..>gone with TAP's super-reinforced SAMCO sport lower intercooler hose)?
..>4. How's driving over 10,000 ft. mountain passes going to effect the car
..>with a mod like this? - Ned made some comment that I may run into some
..>trouble driving it up Pikes Peak - but I wasn't sure exactly what he was
..>getting at - he didn't give me any specifics.
..>5. How's the clutch going to hold up with this much horsepower (assuming I
..>don't do anything stupid like dropping it a few times from 5,000 rpms)?
..>6. What's the normal life of a 200 TQ or S4 clutch?
..>7. Anyone else out there running 3.0 bar (24-25psig) on a 10V Turbo and what
..>are your impressions/experiences?
..>94S4 and 90CQ
..>R.I.P. 91 200 TQ and 88 80Q